2015 Survey: Annotated Data

In 2015, Open Road Alliance conducted a 400-respondent survey designed to look at the frequency of need for contingency funding as reported by Funders and Grantees. The survey was designed to explore questions about risk and contingency funding.

The survey data lead to five key findings:

  1. Disruptions requiring additional funds (i.e., contingency funds) are common and expected. Both grantees and Funders report that 1 in 5 projects require contingency funding to bring projects in on time and with full impact.
  2. It is not a common practice for Funders or Grantees to address these risks before they happen.
  3. When contingency funds are needed, most Funders do have the operational and financial capacity to respond. When asked, the majority of Funders do approve additional requests.
  4. Grantees are hesitant to communicate with Funders about potential obstacles.
  5. Funders’ and Grantee’s perceptions regarding the effects of their actions on each other are often misaligned.

Take a look at the survey’s annotated data:
NGO Data
Funder Data


More Research Resources

View All Research Resources
Open Road Resource
Survey Databook: 2018 Contingency Funding in Philanthropy Assessment
In 2017, to build on the findings from its 2015 study, Open Road commissioned Harder+Company Community Research to conduct an in-depth assessment of what happens to nonprofits when they encounter unexpected catastrophic roadblocks and how foundations respond to offer support.
Open Road Resource
Roadblock Analysis Report
The findings from this multivariable roadblock analysis provide the first-ever empirical dataset on “what goes wrong” in impact- focused projects and offer early conclusions on how specific roadblocks correlate with other variables.
Open Road Resource
Risk in Philanthropy: A Framework for Evaluation
This brief framework is designed to provide grantmakers and NGOs with tools to conceptualize and describe risk and its implications within the scope of their philanthropic work.
Open Road Resource
Foundations Don’t Know What They’re Risking
Critical gaps exist in philanthropy’s definitions of and approach to risk management. This article describes the scope of the problem and a framework for philanthropists to adopt risk-management practices that better equip the sector to address the challenges of our time.